nsn news and rn2.10

Involved Joined: Apr 22, 2006 Posts: 356

Just wondering if anyone is using nsn news with rn2.10?

Thanks.

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:18 pm

I am sure there are... where art thou NSN news'ters???

Site Admin Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: 6432

I have a test site with RN 2.02 and NSN News 2.0RC2, but haven't updated it to RN 2.10.

Sells PC To Pay For Divorce Joined: Posts: 5661

well i did hear a lot of complaints when the latest news was released...
so most people used the previous version as the latest had some bugs....ahum..sssttt

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:45 pm

Quote:

well i did hear a lot of complaints when the latest news was released...

That was my experience so I ditched it early on, BUT, I could have sworn that others have gotten it working.

Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:54 am

I think it works, for the most part, but needs some touch ups here and there...

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:03 pm

I was using it on my previous site, I did have to fix a few things but after that it worked nice. Just wondering about adding the editor to it.

Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:29 pm

If you look at the download of nukeWYSIWYG, it includes replacement files to use with NSN News 2.0 with the editor already added.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:38 am

Thanks, I did look after updating the post and saw a download for it that I hadn't seen the last time I visited the site.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:19 am

I can't say whether this applies to NSN news since I have never looked at it but ... I was recently working with NSN scripts that I purchased as the basis for a Paypal application and they were DEFINITELY not HTML 4.01 compliant. For instance the attribute values in a form were not quoted. So, I think that if you use these scripts you might be cutting the legs out from under a lot of the work that was done to make RN compliant. That's just a guess that someone who has the scripts would have to confirm. And while it might not matter to you, a lot of the efficiency work that was done with RN, like changing to string concatenation instead of double quotes wherever possible, will probably also be undone.