| Author |
Message |
Guardian2003 Site Admin

Joined: Aug 28, 2003 Posts: 6373 Location: Vsetin, Czech Republic
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:03 am |
|
Would be nice to see NS supporting detection and tracking of IPv6 addresses and maybe move completely from using IPv4 to IPv6 for the IP2C data |
|
|
|
 |
montego Site Admin

Joined: Aug 29, 2004 Posts: 9133 Location: Arizona
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:28 am |
|
While I absolutely agree with IPv6 support for NS, it needs to be throughout the package, wherever checks are made. Can we really get rid of IPv4 though? Isn't there always going to be IPv4 traffic... indefinitely? (Sorry, don't really fully understand all the nuances of this). |
|
|
|
 |
kd8hho Worker


Joined: Mar 30, 2009 Posts: 111
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:21 pm |
|
IP4 prob isnt going anywhere, but def add support for IP6 in NS |
|
|
|
 |
Guardian2003 Site Admin

Joined: Aug 28, 2003 Posts: 6373 Location: Vsetin, Czech Republic
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:56 pm |
|
@M I think IPv4 will be around for quite a while yet, though will probably get phased out at some point. For now, there has to be a mechanism to handle both.
I have IPv6 IP2C data but it's not much good without the ability of NS to handle it and act on it. |
|
|
|
 |
kd8hho Worker


Joined: Mar 30, 2009 Posts: 111
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:19 pm |
|
I could see ip4 getting shifted to local (sorta what the 10.xx and 192.168.xx is now) |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|